Finance Usage Based

Risklytics

Wildfire risk scores, expected losses, and retrofit paths through an API

Visit official website
PricingUsage Based
Starting price$20/mo
Free planNo
Free trialYes
APIYes
Open sourceNo
DeploymentUnknown
Last verifiedJuly 30, 2026
Overview

Tool overview

Risklytics is listed under Finance AI tools.

Summary

What is Risklytics?

Risklytics now provides Ember, a wildfire-risk API and dashboard for California properties. It returns a wildfire risk score, expected annual loss, explainable risk factors, insurability context, and retrofit actions, with documented batch and partner workflows.

Best fit

Best for

Insurers and property teams assessing explainable wildfire exposure

Audience

Who is it for?

Insurance carriersMGAs and brokersProperty-risk teamsHomeowners and resilience planners
Recommendation

Decision note

Accepted for Preview after independent V411 official-source research. Apply only after the AREX report shows failures = 0, warnings = 0, unmapped = 0, and the proposed controlled fields, Arabic v2 lists, outreach, affiliate outcome, logo QA, and any explicit clears have been reviewed.

Capabilities

Key features

Property-level wildfire risk score

Expected annual loss estimation

Explainable risk factors and retrofit path

Batch scoring and partner API workflows

Model-version and artifact documentation

Workflows

Use cases

Screening wildfire exposure

Supporting underwriting review

Prioritizing property retrofits

Comparing portfolio risk

Integrating property-risk APIs

Strengths

Pros

  • Publishes pricing and API documentation
  • Provides model-version transparency
  • Offers explainable mitigation context
Considerations

Limitations

Risk scores and expected-loss estimates are model outputs, not guarantees or complete underwriting decisions. Users should validate addresses and property characteristics, review model versions and uncertainty, comply with insurance law, and combine results with inspections and qualified judgment.

Cost

Pricing details

Pricing modelUsage Based
Starting price$20/mo
Free planNo
Free trialYes
Pricing context

Billing options

Monthly subscriptionPrepaid credit top-upsTeam contact sales
Pricing context

Pricing note

Individual access costs $20 per month and includes 2,500 scores. Teams, carriers, and MGAs use contact-sales terms. Prepaid credit top-ups of $25, $50, and $100 are available, with a stated bonus on larger top-ups. The mix of subscription allowances and credits is recorded as usage-based.

View official pricing
Compatibility

Supported languages

  • English
Specs

Technical details

PlatformsAPI
Multilingual supportUnknown
Login requiredYes
Open sourceNo
DeploymentUnknown
CompanyRisklytics
Current versionember-1.3.0-firewall
Models / versionsember-1.3.0-firewall
Editions / plansIndividual Teams Carriers and MGAs
Data confidenceHigh
Last verifiedJuly 30, 2026
Decision hub

Finish your evaluation of Risklytics

Move between similar tools, comparison cards, quick answers, user reviews, and open discussion without leaving the page.

Tools, comparisons & answers

Explore the best next step before choosing Risklytics

Browse similar tools, open focused comparison cards, and answer the most common buying questions.

Answers

Frequently asked questions

Risklytics now provides Ember, a wildfire-risk API and dashboard for California properties. It returns a wildfire risk score, expected annual loss, explainable risk factors, insurability context, and retrofit actions, with documented batch and partner workflows.
Insurers and property teams assessing explainable wildfire exposure
The listed pricing model for Risklytics is Usage-based. Pricing can change, so users should verify the latest plan details on the official website.
Yes. The current profile indicates that a free trial is available.
Community proof

User reviews

Real user feedback helps others understand strengths, limitations, and the best-fit workflows before choosing this tool.

No reviews Average rating
0 Total reviews
No reviews yet

Be the first to review Risklytics

Share what worked, what did not, who this AI tool is best for, and what buyers should verify before choosing it.

Ask in discussion
Tool discussion

Ask or discuss this tool

Ask questions, share workflows, or discuss your experience with this AI tool.

ReplyContinue threads
EditUpdate your posts
ReportKeep it useful
0Total messages
0Threads
0Replies
Start a useful threadAsk, compare workflows, or reply to reviews

Keep it specific and helpful. You can edit or delete your own messages after posting.

Please log in to join the discussion.

Live discussion

Community messages

Reply to messages and keep the discussion useful. Use Report for abuse or spam. Your own posts can be edited or deleted.

No discussion yetBe the first to ask a question or share a useful workflow.